The crusade against the odds

11 min read

Chronic starvation, hostile landscapes, powerful foes – the First Crusade overcame seemingly insurmountable challenges. Emily Briffett speaks to expert historians to reveal how zeal, strategy and sheer luck secured military success for this ambitious campaign

Crusading zeal A 14th-century depiction of the siege of Jerusalem, a climactic moment in the First Crusade. Pope Urban II’s 1095 call to arms saw western Europeans head to the near east to capture the Holy Land
ALAMY

After three long years, the campaign reached its climax. In June 1099, a crusader army arrived outside Jerusalem and stared up at its towering walls. From late 1095, men, women and children from western Europe had left their homes and set out east on a vast military expedition that would take them to the Holy Land. Now, after enduring lightning ambushes, desperate sieges and periods of near starvation, the jewel in the crown of Christendom was in their sights.

But not yet within their grasp. Between the crusaders and the conquest of Jerusalem stood the city’s determined defenders. These troops of the Fatimid caliphate – a Shia Muslim empire spanning north Africa and parts of the near east, with its capital in Cairo – guarded a population of perhaps 20,000 Muslims, Jews and eastern Orthodox Christians massed within.

At first, the defenders prevailed, resisting everything the increasingly frustrated crusader forces could throw at them. But then, after weeks of skirmishes and as a last resort, the nobleman Godfrey of Bouillon used a siege tower to gain a priceless toehold on the walls to the north of the city, and was able to open the nearest gate.

Hundreds of crusaders poured in. In the searing heat, simmering anger and frustration was unleashed, and a number of the inhabitants were slaughtered. When the dust settled, Godfrey was declared ‘Defender of the Holy Sepulchre’ – ruler in all but name. The holy city was finally in the hands of the crusaders.

The capture of Jerusalem was a bloody catastrophe for its inhabitants. Indeed, the campaign that preceded it – and others that followed, along with the partisan European views of these events – continue to be problematic in modern eyes. Yet in purely military terms, the conquest of Jerusalem was an astonishing victory for those Christian attackers – and the culmination of one of the most unlikely, against-the-odds endeavours of the entire Middle Ages: the First Crusade.

The spark that lit the tinder for this campaign wa

This article is from...

Related Articles

Related Articles