SPECIAL REPORT
We asked what you thought of one CCW reader’s proposal for specialist-led inspections instead of MoTs – and many of you think it’s a good idea
A proposal for classics to be given ‘non-MoT’ inspections in lieu of government-backed tests has met with a positive reaction from owners.
Geoff Fry’s ‘non-MoT’ approach of annually taking his MGB – which is exempt from MoTs on account of its age – to a classic specialist was highlighted in our 28 February issue, following an incident in which police in Essex seized an MoT-exempt Austin Allegro due to its poor overall condition,
He said: ‘I take my Oselli-tuned fast-road MGB roadster to the local garage that MoTs my modern vehicles where it is given an MoT-standard check for brakes, steering, suspension, etc. – anything that could compromise the safety of the vehicle on the public roads.
‘I pay a £50 ‘fee’ and the garage gives me a dated receipt listing the work carried out.’
Readers who voiced their support for the approach included Gary Flinn, who told Classic Car Weekly: ‘I have been a long time classic car owner and have continued to get my classic MoT tested since 2018 more for peace of mind and to ensure that I would have some proof that the car was roadworthy when last tested within the last 12-month period should the worst happen while I’m driving my classic and I was involved in a major accident.
‘The proof of recent MoT testing should help with any issues with the police or my insurance company should I be in the unfortunate situation of the car being written off or needing serious expense to keep it on the road.’
Bristol 401 owner Colin Lewis said: ‘I think that a voluntary approach by owners to make arrangements with a local trusted garage for the non-MoT test described, and the introduction of an MoT test designed specifically for classic cars is time and money very well spent indeed.
‘I hope many more readers will join Geoff and me in adapting their approach to the annual checking of our beloved examples of motoring histor
