*CCW reserves the right to edit letters for space reasons and cannot return hard correspondence.
A rusty museum? I’d pay to see it…
I read your recent article about the museum dedicated to the Morris Minor (CCW, 3 April).
I'm not a big car museum fan personally because I like to see classics out and about being used but for me there is one exception. Seeing a Morris Minor recently for sale, for parts before its scrapped, it occurred to me the perfect museum would be a ‘rust in piece’ museum where cars like this Moggy – clearly too far gone for restoration – could be put on display instead of just being crushed. Once these scrap classics have gone, they are gone forever!
I'd love to own such a museum but lack of funds rules me out. I'm sure it would be a fascinating experience rather than just the usual nice, clean, tidy, shiny cars.
I just think it's so sad to see a 60-year-old car sent to the crusher; I'd certainly pay to see these rusty relics.
The barn-find display at the Practical Classics Restoration Show has always been a hit with enthusiasts, so you might just be onto something there, Chris! –Ed.
No substitute for checks
It makes complete sense to have an MoT annually on any car, no matter what age or type it may be.
However, be aware that the MoT is only concerned that the vehicle meets minimum standards and does not ensure lasting safety. There is no substitute for experience.
Also, not using a car – not just a classic – does not mean that it will not deteriorate and become unsafe, so letting someone check over your car should also be a minimum standard.
We’ve long argued that having an independent set of eyes look over a classic – be it a specialist or an MoT tester – is a good thing for enjoying classics safely – Ed.
A laudable Daimler resto
It seems appropriate to thank and
