In the garden
THE garden is now entering its season of vigour and exuberance. The iris and peonies are showing off, the alliums seem more abundant than ever, the paulownias are looking magnificent and the roses are gearing themselves up to full flowering. Everywhere is flamboyance, but snuggled away among this brouhaha are the discreet soft-grey mounds of old-fashioned pinks.
Over the past few years, as part of an ongoing attempt to reduce my work in the garden, I have been considering that my small collection of pinks is too much bother for too little reward and that I need to clear them out. For most of the year, they are a sprawl of not-very-interesting foliage that suffers in wet summers and becomes so woody and ugly that, every few years, the plant needs to be refreshed from cuttings.
And then they flower—smothering the foliage with tiny round flowers of white, burgundy and, of course, pink, whose charm alone would earn them a place in any garden, but which bring with them a perfume as intoxicating as any rose. A small vase of Dianthus ‘Elizabethan’ sits on my desk and its sparkling white flowers with dark maroon eyes are producing a strong spicy scent with distinctive notes of clove.
Pinks are forms of Dianthus plumarius and have been grown in British gardens since at least the middle of the 16th century. (Why they are called pinks is not known for certain; it may be a reference to the serrated edges of the petals.) ‘Elizabethan’ is thought to date from about 1700, roughly the same time as ‘Painted Lady’, which has crimped white petals and a raspberry centre.
In my garden, it is the most floriferous of the family. Dating plants is difficult, but most growers agree that Dianthus ‘Pheasant Eye’ has been around since before 1600. It has irregularly shaped, shaggy petals and a burgundy eye that give it a wild look. Perhaps the best known of the pinks are the frilly white flowers of the Victorian variety ‘Mrs Sinkins’.
In the gardens at Glyndebourne, it edges 20 yards of a path, looking and smelling glorious through June and into July.
It took some time for me to be seduced by the charms of pinks.
As a young man, I thought of them as old-fashioned plants, familiar as a favoured plant of elderly relatives and of no interest to a modern gardener intoxicated with new cultivars and the latest plant discovery.
A thread leads from the Huguenots and the Paisley weavers to today
My interest in the genus was eventually kindled about 25 years ago by the late Mark Trenear, a third-generation nurseryman whose passion and enthusiasm for pinks was infectious. He travelled the country collecting plants, stud
