The art of seeing

1 min read

With iPhone photography and ‘appropriated art’, Benedict Brain continues his creative journey

What do you think of appropriated art? Is it something you could embrace or should it be frowned upon?

These images above were made with my iPhone. I have recently started using it as a more serious photographic tool – partly because I’ve just upgraded to a swanky iPhone 15 Pro Max and partly because I’m pitching a book about iPhone photography to a publisher, but mainly because it’s a damn good photographic tool. I used to use my phone to ‘sketch’ ideas, make record shots or candid family images. But recently, I’ve started reaching for my iPhone as a first-choice creative option.

These images focus on small segments of some advertising hoarding promoting a local beer somewhere in the South Pacific. I was initially seduced by the way time, light and weather had deteriorated, faded and eroded the advertisement. The tears and scars in relative close-up took on a new aesthetic that I liked. I also enjoyed the act of taking an existential step back, or in this case, forward, to isolate and decontextualise parts of the image; focusing on parts of the smiles in an extreme close-up makes them feel more demonic, manic and deranged than the happy and carefree vibe they were intended to evoke. Mischievously, I enjoy this.

I acknowledge that this is a form of appropriation and I’m not entirely sure how I feel about it, but I’m not the first. These images could be seen to be in the tradition of the controversial American artist Richard Prince, who was known for

This article is from...

Related Articles

Related Articles