editor’s letter
The row around the Commonwealth Games is fascinating. At present, nobody wants to host in 2026. Victoria in Australia pulled out. Neighbouring city Gold Coast, in Queensland, which had suggested it could step in, quickly stepped out. The hokey cokey then saw Singapore and Malaysia also say no dice. The Canadian province of Alberta ruled themselves out of the 2030 games, just to make it clear there was NO WAY they’d get in on the 2026 action. So don’t even think about asking.
At present, if you have an Argos gazebo and a water feature in your back garden the Commonwealth Games Federation might come knocking.
A fortnight ago, Glasgow was asked if they’d take on the event. Games organisers were quick to insist there would be no cost to the public purse, that it’d be a scaled-down version, that they’d make £100 million available to the host city and that the rest, the odd £30m-£50m, could be raised through commercial means. That’s confidence for you.
Glasgow hosted the Commonwealth Games in 2014. It was a fantastic event. The sun shone, the streets gleamed, the city felt alive. The event cost £543m.
The arguments about legacy remain. It unquestionably helped lift the city – there is a world-class velodrome that frequently hosts global events, the athletes’ accommodation built in the east end of the city is now occupied by a generation of people on the housing ladder, bringing life and investment, and there will be young athletes who were inspired to take up sport because of it. It also helped remind those outside the place that Glasgow is a great, big, successful European city.
On the other hand, there is an argument that half a billion spent on infrastructure development with more staying power could have delivered similar outcomes.
Which brings us to the question of 2026. Should Glasgow host? Or should there be a Games at all? Glasgow, like most major cities, has its own financial pressures at present.
The city council declared a housing emergency in November. There is a fear of a budget shortfall of £107m over the next three years within the council.
