Washington correspondent

1 min read

The D.C. Brief By Philip Elliott

Democrat John Fetterman, who benefited from bad GOP recruiting, at a Nov. 3 event
WIN MCNAMEE—GETTY IMAGES

FROM THE OUTSIDE, THE DEMO-cratic Party has enjoyed a good run lately: beating historical trends in the House, holding the Senate, and expanding its power in state capitals.

That doesn’t mean Democrats actually merited that success in November’s midterm elections—or can depend on it going forward.

The party’s image remains in fixer-upper mode, and its agenda isn’t terribly popular. As one sharp strategist put it in an election-eve memo, “if Democrats manage to hold on to the House and Senate, it will be in spite of the party brand, not because of it.” To channel President Joe Biden: that is not hyperbole.

The warnings were manifest. One Democratic research project ahead of Election Day found that the party was seen as rejecting capitalism. Others warned that Democrats were taking voters of color for granted. Yet another survey showed a 55% majority of all voters saw the Democratic Party as preachy and too extreme, and none too loving of the US of A.

The main reason Democrats prevailed was this: Republicans came off as more extreme in specific places, communities where 7% to 13% of typically reliable GOP voters just couldn’t pull the lever for Senate nominees in competitive races. But hoping the GOP keeps nominating unelectable candidates just isn’t a responsible strategy. There has to be something better, and it has to start in Democ

This article is from...

Related Articles

Related Articles